THE GEORGE SASSOWER,
ESQ. LEGACY PROJECT
SASSOWER
v. MAHONEY
DISTRICT
COURT -- NDNY
Sassower's May 23, 1988 verified petition,
88 Civ 0553 (NDNY - Cholakis)
summons mailed by E. Sassower
Judge Cholakis' July 1, 1988 dismissal order
2nd CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS #88-6203
2nd Circuit's September 26, 1990 Order
(Lumbard,
Newman, Altimari)
referred to:
Sassower v. Sansverie
-- 885 F.2d 9 (2d Cir. 1989)
Sassower v. Sheriff of
Westchester County
-- 824 F.2d 184 (2d Cir. 1987)
Matter of Sassower,
125 AD2d 52 (2d Dep't, appeal dismissed, 70 NY2d 691 (1987)
Sassower v.
Signorelli,
##77C1447, 78C124 (EDNY Nov. 19, 1984)
October 11, 1990
Order denying Sassower's October 1, 1990 motion
for stay
pursuant to US S.Ct Rule & demand
cc:
Sassower's October 22, 1990 petition to US Supreme Court
for stay, prohibition, mandamus
Deputy Clerk's October 30, 1990 letter
2nd Circuit's December 3, 1990 Order
(Lumbard, Newman, Altimari)
referred-to in
April 27, 1990 Order in Sassower v. Abrams (#93-6077)
U.S. SUPREME COURT
Sassower's April 9, 1989
petition for mandamus to 2nd Circuit
see. paras 3. "Some of the actions and proceedings which are
being stonewalled, are as follows:
"d(1) On July 1, 1988, once again, because petitioner could
not lawfully pay pre-petition costs due one (1) defendant
because of a pending bankruptcy proceeding, which was
unlawfully demanded by that single defendant Judge CON. G.
CHOLOKIS, disissed petitioner's action against all fourteen
(14) defendants.
(2) Except for assigning a Docket
Number, the respondent completel and deliberately
stonewalled the processing of such appeal for ten (10)
months.
...(4) of
October 15, 1990
In re George Sassower --
Petition for a Writ of Prohibition and Mandamus
for the
Second Circuit Court of Appeals
Preliminary Statement (at p. iii-iv)
"1. This is the third of
a series of petitions
to the Second, Third, Fourth, Eighth, Ninth and District of
Columbia Circuits.
Consolidation and/or joint considerations of these
interrelated petitions is respectfully requested.
Anticipating consolidation and/or joint consideration by
this Court,
there will be a studied attempt to avoid repetition.
2. There is set forth in this petition only some of the
'hard evidence' of judicial corruption
at the level of the respondent.
b. Familiarity with petitioner's second petition, dated
October 14, 1990 is assumed."
October 15, 1990 in forma pauperis affidavit
October 23, 1990 stay application
November 11, 1990 in
forma pauperis affidavit
November 25, 1990 -- motion for disqualification, stay, etc.
November 26, 1990 -- criminal & civil contempt & stay moving
affirmation
December 6, 1990 supplemental affirmation
December 10, 1990 recusal affirmation
December 10, 1990 stay motion
December 19, 1990
[#90-6785]
Sassower's December 19, 1990 Petition for
a Writ of Certiorari
"Reasons for the Grant of this Writ" (at p. 3)
"There can be
no more important pending petition in this Court
than the series
of petitions being brought by the petitioner, all of which involve
the 'impeachable' conduct of federal judges and the integrity of
the machinery of justice."
motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis
January 14, 1991 moving affirmation
Clerk's January 15, 1991 letter -- docketed as 90-6785
January 26, 1991 moving affirmation to disqualify US Solicitor
General & AG
Clerk's February 19, 1991 denying cert
* * *
91-jan-17-gs-v-pratt-2nd-circuit-amended-petition.pdf
BACK AT THE 2nd CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
#10-2371
(Docketed June 15, 2010)
(NDNY-McAvoy -- 88-CV-563)
2010
Sassower's July 23, 2010 leave to file motion
Clerk O'Hagan Wolfe's August
24, 2010 Order "For the Court"
